![]() ![]() ![]() This systematic review aimed to synthesise research findings on the following questions: (1) How effective are CHW interventions at reaching the most disadvantaged groups in LMIC contexts? and (2) What evidence exists on whether and how these programmes reduce health inequities in the populations they serve? Yet there is limited evidence on whether and how CHW programmes achieve this. ![]() The deployment of Community Health Workers (CHWs) is widely promoted as a strategy for reducing health inequities in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). To do this, they use techniques of indirectly broaching sensitive subjects, acting in a friendly way and being clear about the intention of their work. Community care workers avoid rupturing client performances of hegemonic masculinities which inhibit confession and support. Both parties bump up against ideals of what it means to be a man as they strive to provide care and receive support. Interviews reveal how care workers and clients perform and negotiate masculinities as they navigate hegemonic masculine norms that require men to act tough, suppress emotions and deny weakness and sickness. The empirical analysis draws on the perspectives of eight care workers and three of their male clients from the Cape Town area. Using semi-structured interviews and observational home visits, this study explored the techniques that community care workers employ when working with male clients. Employing men as carers may not only improve the health of the men they assist but also be transformative with regards to gendered constructions of caring. Health-seeking behaviours are also constructed as feminine and men have poorer health outcomes globally. Caring is typically constructed as a feminised practice, resulting in women shouldering the burden of care-related work. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
December 2022
Categories |